ESG by ZYT← All answersHow ESG by ZYT works
Will a report from ESG by ZYT be accepted by my customer, SGX, or a sustainability team?
For a customer’s supplier questionnaire or a tender, yes — that is what it is built for, and the figures carry the boundary, factors and sources a reviewer asks for. For a regulatory filing, no software makes a report acceptable on its own: mandatory filings need assurance, and this product does not provide or replace it.
Being specific about what a reviewer will and will not find:
| Asked for by | Realistic answer |
|---|---|
| A customer’s procurement questionnaire | Yes. This is the intended use. |
| A tender or a bank’s ESG questions | Yes, in most cases. |
| A large customer’s Scope 3 programme | Yes — supplier-reported figures are normal and expected at this tier. |
| An SGX or Bursa filing | Not on its own. Those are ISSB-aligned filings and carry assurance requirements. |
| Anything requiring limited or reasonable assurance | No. An assurance provider must be engaged separately. |
What holds up under scrutiny: every figure traces to a named factor with a publisher and a vintage; the factor is snapshotted so the figure is reproducible later; the claim level is derived from the data rather than selected; missing data is recorded as a stated exclusion instead of being estimated to fill a total; and the software refuses to publish on an unverified factor.
What a sustainability professional will raise, and should: the report is not externally assured, Scope 2 is location-based only, there is no base year so GRI 305-5 stays empty in a first report, and some Scope 3 lines use spend-based proxies. All four are stated in the report itself rather than left to be discovered.
Related
Last reviewed 2026-09-04